Author: Richard N. Bright

Richard N. Bright is CEO of Carbon Registry India and writes on carbon markets, MRV, standards and climate technology. He came to climate from two decades in enterprise technology and looks at carbon as a systems problem: methodologies that cannot be implemented, data that cannot be collected, strategies nobody can act on come Monday morning. Everyone in this market works in silos and the knowledge is scattered; this blog exists to package it together. Resilience first. Carbon next.

5 tracks · 97 sourced claims · 43 dated gaps · 34 primary sources monitored · last checked 14 Sep 2026 · 10 currently unreadable, reported as unknown rather than unchanged

Counted from the records on every page load, never typed. A dated gap is a question one of the six slots asks that has no answer yet — recorded with the day the watch began, rather than left blank. A source that cannot be read is reported as unknown rather than assumed unchanged.

Tracks

Who writes this

Written and maintained by Richard N. Bright, CEO of Carbon Registry India — a non-profit carbon standard and an NCCF initiative.

LinkedIn

When something changes

These pages are re-checked on a schedule. Leave an address and you will hear when a track actually changes — at most once a week, never otherwise, and nothing else.

No list, no sequence, no sharing. One address, one purpose, and removed the day you ask.

Corrections

If a figure here is wrong, say so. It will be corrected, dated, and the correction left visible.

© 2026 Carbon Market India. Standing disclosure: this site is written and maintained by Richard N. Bright, who is CEO of Carbon Registry India — a non-profit carbon standard and an initiative of the Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests — and who separately provides paid advisory work on carbon markets, MRV and compliance readiness. Those interests are declared where they could matter rather than only here: every slot on a track ends in one next step and names the commercial relationship behind it either way, most point to a primary document or to somebody else entirely, and some record that nobody can help yet and say since when. Nothing on a track is sponsored, placed or paid for, and no commission or referral arrangement affects what appears or how a state is judged. Every claim names the document it came from and the day it was last checked; where something could not be established it is listed as a dated gap or as not citable, rather than softened into language that merely sounds sourced. None of this is legal, financial, investment or compliance advice, it is not a substitute for reading the primary documents yourself, and it does not create a client relationship.

5 key reasons that makes Carbon Registry India ideal standard for India 5 things you should know about COP